Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies relating to fragile X syndrome

ABSTRACT

The DNA sequence spanning the fragile X site on the X human chromosome has been obtained in purified and isolated form. As fragile X is associated with mental retardation, the availability of a DNA which spans this locus permits diagnosis and treatment of the related mental disorders. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to an amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:1, a DNA sequence from the Fragile X site, are also disclosed.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/118,200filed on Sep. 9, 1993 (now pending), which is a continuation-in-part ofU.S. application Ser. No. 07/802,650 filed on Dec. 5, 1991 (nowabandoned), which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser.No. 07/672,232 filed on Mar. 20, 1991 (now abandoned), which was acontinuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/638,518 filed onJan. 4, 1991 (now abandoned).

This invention was made with Government support under HG00247 awarded byNIH. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to genetic diagnosis of humans. Inparticular, the invention concerns identification of individuals havingparticular DNA sequences predictive for Fragile X Syndrome.

BACKGROUND ART

Fragile X Syndrome is the most common form of familial mentalretardation and affects about one in 2,500 children. The syndrome ischaracterized by the presence of a cytogenetically detectable fragilesite in band q27.3 near the end of the long arm of the X chromosomewhich, if not the cause of the disorder, is closely associated with it.The diagnostic molecular genetics of the Fragile X Syndrome has beenreviewed by Sutherland, G. R. et al. (Clinical Genet. (1990) 37:2-11).An additional review is found by Nussbaum, R. L. et al (Ann. Rev. Genet.(1986) 20:109-145).

Identification of the DNA spanning and including the fragile site hasbeen reported by Kremer et al (Am. J. Human Genetics (1991) 49:656-661)and Heitz et al. (Science (1991) 251:1236). Characterization of thefragile site has indicated a particular region of instability within a5.0 KB EcoRI restriction fragment, with the instability segregating withthe Fragile X genotype (Yu et al., Science (1991) 252:1179). The regionof instability has further been localized to a 1 KB Pst I fragmentcontaining a p(CCG)_(n) repeat. The Fragile X genotype is characterizedby an increased amount of unstable DNA that maps to the repeat (Kremeret al., Science (1991) 252:1711). The availability of the cloned DNAmakes possible the use of the DNA as a probe to detect lengthpolymorphism of the P(CCG)_(n) to characterize the genotype of anindividual at that locus (Kremer et al., supra), thereby obviatingproblems with cytogenetic visualization at the fragile site (Webb etal., Prenatal Diagnosis (1989) 9:771-781).

Additional diagnostic tools are available in the form of polymorphicmicrosatellite markers linked to the fragile site at Xq27.3 (FRAXA).Richards, et al., (Am. J. Hum, Genet. (1991) 48:1051-1057) havedescribed polymorphisms associated with length variation in dinucleotidemicrosatellite repeats in the vicinity of Xq27.3. These markers have arecombination frequency of 1% and 7%, respectively, in two-point linkageanalysis in 31 Fragile X families.

Thus, the availability of cloned DNA spanning the fragile site providesreagents uniquely suited for the detection of the Fragile X allele inappropriate subjects. Furthermore, techniques of gene therapy could beused to replace or compensate for the pathologic Fragile X sequence inaffected cell types.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a human DNA sequence corresponding to the FragileX locus and provides a source for suitable probes for diagnosis andsequences useful for modification in therapy. The obtention of thissequence from the fragile site thus permits an improvement in diagnostictechniques as well as the possibility for genetic manipulation toovercome the disorder.

In one aspect, the invention is directed to an isolated and purified DNAmolecule of no more than 275 kb which includes the fragile site. Inanother aspect, the invention is directed to a subsequence contained inthis larger DNA of no more than 150 kb, which includes the fragile site.In still another aspect, the invention is directed to a DNA probe whichcrosses the fragile site, and to the corresponding normal sequenceuseful in replacement therapy.

In still other aspects, the invention is directed to methods todetermine the presence or absence of the Fragile X allele in a subjectwhich method comprises probing DNA isolated from the subject with theprobe of the invention. Affected individuals appear to have anamplification of a (CCG)_(n) repeat sequence at the fragile site whichgives a band of different size than a normal individual when Southernblots are probed with the probe of the invention.

In another aspect, the invention is directed to oligonucleotides usefulas primers in the polymerase chain reaction amplification of polymorphicmicrosatellite AC repeats closely linked to the Fragile X locus. Thus,these primers may be used to identify alleles of the microsatelliteregions which vary in AC repeat length, thereby providing a method forscreening for a microsatellite repeat sequence allele predictive ofinheritance of the Fragile X allele.

In still another aspect, the invention is directed to methods to correctthe fragile site by substituting the normal DNA contained in this regionor otherwise compensating for this defect, such as by administration ofthe normal protein product or by antibodies directed against the proteinproduct.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic of XTY26, a 280 kb plasmid derived from a yeastartificial chromosome (YAC) including a 275 kb human DNA sequencespanning the fragile site.

FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting the steps taken in localizing the DNAsequences which comprise the fragile site and the variable region.

FIG. 3 depicts the Southern blot analysis of SRI-digested somatic hybridcell DNAs with subclone λ-5, which comprises the 5 kb EcoRI fragmentfrom XTY26.

FIG. 4 depicts the Southern blot analysis of EcoRI-digested DNA from twonormal and four unrelated Fragile X Syndrome affected males withsubclone λ-5.

FIG. 5A illustrates a Fragile X Syndrome pedigree, while FIG. 5B depictsthe Southern blot analysis of PstI-digested DNA fro the members of thatillustrated Fragile X Syndrome pedigree.

FIG. 6 [SEQ ID NO: 1] illustrates the DNA sequence of the 1.0 kb PstIfragment from a Fragile X Syndrome library.

FIGS. 7A [SEQ ID NO.:11], 7B [SEQ ID NO.:12] and 7C [SEQ ID NO.: 13]illustrate the location of primer sequences and polymorphicmicrosatellite regions for FRAXAc1, FRAXAc2 and FRAXAc3, respectively.

FIG. 8 illustrates the location of subclones of the=I region of thefragile site.

MODES OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Definitions

As used herein, “fragile site” refers to a DNA sequence which occurs atthe Xq27.3 locus on the X chromosome in individuals subject to familialmental retardation associated with Fragile X syndrome. “Fragile X locus”refers to this location whether in normal individuals or in personsaffected by the condition.

As used herein, “expression” of fragile X DNA refers to cytogenetic ormicroscopic manifestation of the fragile site.

All DNA sequences disclosed herein are intended to include complementarysequences, unless otherwise indicated. All DNA sequences are written ina 5′-to-3′ direction and conform to nucleotide symbols recommended bythe IUPAC-IUB Biochemical Nomenclature Commission.

Construction of XTY26

A DNA library was constructed from a human subject known to contain theFragile X locus by the procedure of Reithman H. C. et al. (Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA (1989) 86:6240). The procedure is designed to rescuetelomeres by complementation and was modified by digesting the vectorpTYAC1, which propagates in yeast as an “artificial yeast chromosome”(YAC) with BamHI and EcoRI or ClaI to accommodate inserts digested witheither EcoRI or TaqI and obtained from the human genomic DNA describedbelow. This method of construction of the YAC library selects for cloneswhich acquire or no longer need an additional telomere. A few clonescontain true telomere sequences, others contain segments fromnontelomeric regions. Circular chromosomes which are maintained as suchin yeast also satisfy the selection (Hieter, P., et al., Cell (1985)40:381).

The immediate source of the genomic DNA that was inserted in the vectorwas the human/hamster somatic cell hybrid X3000.11, described byNussbaum, R. L. et al. (Ann. Rev. Genet. (1986) 20:109-145) which isknown to contain a region of human X chromosome from band q24 to qterwhich spans Xq27.3 and which is known to have the abnormal Fragile Xfrom the original human subject. This portion of the X chromosome istranslocated onto a hamster chromosome in the somatic cell hybrid. TheDNA from X3000.11 was digested with TaqI, ligated into pTYACI andtransformed into yeast on selective media. The resulting library wasscreened with the pVK16BI probe known to map close to the fragile siteas described by Abidi, F. E., et al. (Genomics (1990) 7:363), and onlyone clone, XTY26, was positive.

Analysis of the XTY26 clone led to the conclusion that it is a circularYAC with the map shown in FIG. 1. In situ hybridization was used todetermine that the XTY26 clone spanned the fragile site. Total DNA wasextracted from yeast cultures containing XTY26 and labeled withfluorescence using the technique of Kievits, T. et al. (Cytogenet. CellGenet. (1990) 53:134), and the labeled DNA was used as a probe for jasitu hybridization to metaphase chromosomes expressing Fragile X. Thelocation of the fluorescence labeling relative to the cytogeneticallyobservable fragile site was observed as shown in Table 1. Thelocation-of the fluorescence on the chromosome was scored as “proximal,”“central” or “distal.”

TABLE 1 Location of Signal for Various Probes in Relation to the FragileSite at Xq27.3 Position of signal in relation to fragile site ProbeProximal Central Distal Proximal and Distal XTY26 11 10 39 8 VK16 10 2 00 2-34 9 3 0 0 Do33 0 0 10 0

Sequential metaphase spreads from two Fragile X males were examineduntil at least ten X chromosomes expressing the fragile site andexhibiting signal from probe hybridization had been scored. The positionof the signal was scored as proximal, central (i.e., overlying the gapin the chromosome) or distal to the fragile site. Sensitivity andspecificity was such that 35-90% of all metaphases (depending upon theprobe) had yellow fluorescent dots on the end of at least one chromatidof the X chromosome with virtually no background signal.

In this context, proximal with respect to the fragile X site meanscloser to the centromere; distal with respect to fragile X refers to alocation closer to the telomere. The majority of the signal was founddistal to the fragile site, even though the probe VK16 used to isolateXTY26 was proximal with respect to the Fragile X locus in j situhybridization. The finding of label over proximal, central and distalsites as shown in Table 1 indicates that the clone XTY26 contains DNAcomplementary to areas of DNA throughout the fragile region.

Additional flanking DNA markers known to map close to the fragile site,Do33 (DXS465) and 2-34 (DXS463), described by Rousseau, F. et al. (Am.J. Hum. Genet. (1991) 48:108-116) were also found to be present in XTY26and their maps for the restriction enzymes BamHI, HindIII and TaqI wereidentical in both XTY26 and human chromosomal DNA. Because the markerDo33 binds to DNA distal with respect to the fragile site, and marker2-34 binds to DNA proximal with respect to the fragile site in situhybridization, their presence in the XTY26 clone supports the conclusionthat the DNA insert in the clone spans the fragile region.

The circularity of XTY26 was verified using restriction analysis, andrests on at least four observations. 1) SalI cuts XTY26 only once andmaps within DXS293 which, according to other digests with NaeI, mapstoward the middle of the human DNA sequence. The SalI digest gives onlya minimal alteration in the size of XTY26 as compared to undigested DNA,consistent with the slight difference between circular and linear DNA ofthe same mass. 2) DXS293 mapped into the same NruI fragment as 2-34 (140kb) but to a 120 kb SfiI fragment that was different from the 160 kbSfiI fragment bearing 2-34. The two SfiI fragments (DXS293, 120 kb and2-34, 160 kb) equalled the total length of XTY26. 3) In addition, 2-34mapped to within 60 kb of one end of the human DNA insert on an NaeIdigest and also to a 50 kb ClaI fragment, yet vector sequences which mapto the same 60 kb NaeI fragment are found on a 80 kb ClaI fragment. TheClaI sites at map positions 5 kb, 55 kb and 205 kb indicate the originof these fragments. 4) A subclone of XTY26 has been generated whichcontains both Do33 and vector sequences. This places the vectorsequences between Do33 and 2-34 completing a circle with the human DNAinsert (FIG. 1).

Most of the restriction endonucleases used to generate the pulsed-fieldgel map of XTY26 contain CpG dinucleotides in their recognitionsequences. While this contributes to their underrepresentation in thegenome, and therefore utility in long range restriction mapping, themethylation of mammalian DNA at these sites rendered a direct comparisonof the XTY26 map to human chromosomal DNA all but useless. A fortunateexception was SfiI whose recognition sequence does not contain CpG andwhich generates a 120 kb SfiI fragment from XTY26 containing DSX293 andmost of the DNA between this locus and Do33 (approximately 150 kb). Thesame 120 kb SfiI fragment was detected in human lymphocyte DNA from anormal individual confirming the integrity of at least a portion of thehuman DNA sequence in XTY26. The integrity of the human insert isfurther supported by evidence from restriction maps of YACs in this areathat show the probes 2-34 and Do33 markers to be approximately 210 kbapart. Consistent with these data is the finding that these markers arebetween 230 and 260 kb apart in XTY26.

XTY26 was deposited at the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville,MD, on November 10, 1992, under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, andhas accession no. ATCC 74193.

Location of a DNA Probe Scanning Fragile X

To identify sequences which constitute the fragile site and to screenfor DNA differences between normal and Fragile X individuals in thevicinity of the fragile site, sequences from XTY26 were used ashybridization probes. Localization of the fragile site was accomplishedby first establishing a contig of λ-phage subclones between the twoclosest sequences which flanked the fragile site. A diagram of therelevant portion of XTY26 is shown in FIG. 2.

The VK16 site (which had been utilized to isolate XTY26) has beenlocalized proximal to the fragile site by in situ hybridization (Kremer,E. et al., Am. J. Human Genet. (1991) 49:656-661), incorporated hereinby reference). Its position in XTY26 is shown in FIG. 2. The distal endof the contig was established by initially screening the lambda libraryof XTY26 with an Alu PCR product (Nelson, D. L. et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA (1989) 86:6686), referred to as Alu2 (FIG. 2). Thesubclone #91 was isolated with this probe and was subsequently shown byin situ hybridization to map distal to the fragile site. Riboprobes fromeach end of #91 were used to “walk away” from this locus and thedirection of the “walk” was established by hybridization back to blotsof various restriction enzyme digests of XTY26. Each of the lambdasubclones between #91 and VK16 was mapped relative to the fragile siteby in situ hybridization.

The detailed steps of the above procedure are depicted in FIG. 2, andare as follows. The letters at the beginning of each paragraph refer tothe figure.

A: The “rare-cutter” restriction endonuclease map of the yeastartificial chromosome, XTY26, was determined by pulse-field gelelectrophoresis (Kremer, E. et al., Am. J. Human Genet. (1991)49:656-661). The locations of four probes (VK16, 2-34, Do33 and Alu 2)are indicated. Alu 2 was generated in a PCR using XTY26 DNA as templateand the Alu consensus sequence oligo TC-65 (Nelson, D. L. et al., Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1989) 86:6686) as primer. The localization ofother probes has been reported previously (Kremer, E. et al., supra).

B and C: A contig of subcloned DNA fragments of XTY26 was generated byconstruction of a partial Sau3AI digest library in λGEM-3 (Promega),using the manufacturer's protocols and packaging extracts. The librarywas first screened with total human DNA, then the plaque-purified arrayof 108 clones was probed with Alu2 and VK16. Riboprobes were generated(again using the manufacturer's protocols and reagents) from thepositive clones and used to “walk” towards and across the fragile siteregion. The direction of the “walk” was established by mapping theseriboprobes back to the XTY26 restriction map. Each of the subclones wasthen used in fluorescence in situ hybridization to localize the fragilesite with respect to the contig. This localization and its approximateboundaries are shown by dashed lines.

D and E: Each of the clones which flank and span the fragile siteregion, as defined by in situ hybridization, were used as probes onSouthern blots of somatic cell hybrid DNAs. These results confirmed theEcoRI restriction map across this region. The location of thebreakpoints in hybrids Q1X and micro 21D are indicated by dashed lines.

F: This shows the restriction endonuclease map of the 5 kb EcoRIfragment which demonstrates instability in Fragile X individuals. TheCpG region is indicated by the cluster of “rare-cutter” restrictionendonuclease recognition sites.

G: Restriction fragments were used as hybridization probes to delineatethe region of instability.

The in situ hybridization mapping delineated the sequences whichappeared to “bridge” the fragile site to about 15 kb, although theextent and boundaries of this region could not be sharply defined. Eachof the lambda clones which bridged the fragile site was then used as ahybridization probe against several somatic cell hybrid DNAs. Two ofthese, Q1X and micro 21D, had been constructed from a Fragile X parentcell line (Y75-1B-MI) in a way designed to break the X chromosome at thefragile site (Warren, S. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1990)87:3856). These hybrids have breakpoints which mapped within the same 5kb EcoRI restriction fragment (FIGS. 2 and 3).

With respect to FIG. 3, chromosomal DNA was isolated from the somatichybrid cell line CY3, which contains the Xq26-qter region intact from anormal X chromosome (lane 1); Y75-1B-M1 (lane 2): Q1X (lane 3): Micro21D (lane 4) and the mouse cell line A9, which is one parent line of CY3(lane 5). The chromosomal DNA was subjected to cleavage with restrictionendonuclease EcoRI, subjected to gel electrophoresis, and probed withnick-translated λ5. The Southern Blot obtained is shown in FIG. 3. Thekb EcoRI fragment normally expected, which contains the Q1X and Micro210 breakpoints and the Y75-1B-M1 instability, is arrowed in each lane.This is altered in mobility in Q1X, Micro 21D and Y75-1B-M1 s shown. The5.3 and 1.3 kilobase EcoRI fragments flank the unstable fragment and arepresent in the Micro 21D and Q1X hybrids, respectively.

Cell line Y75-1B-M1 demonstrated an increase in size in the commonbreakpoint fragment from 5 to 5.9 kb. It appeared, therefore, that thisvariation might be associated with the fragile site, and this hypothesiswas then tested.

The λ5 subclone containing the 5 kb EcoRI fragment was used as a probeon DNA from both normal and unrelated Fragile X Syndrome affected males.As depicted in FIG. 4, DNA from four unrelated Fragile X Syndromeaffected males (lanes 3 to 6) was digested with EcoRI and subjected toSouthern blot analysis using subclone λ-#5 as probe. Comparison withnormal male DNA (lane 1) and with a normal male from an affectedpedigree (lane 2) revealed the altered mobility of the 5 kb EcoRIfragment to one or more high molecular weight bands in each of theaffected individuals. Accordingly, it has been found that unrelatedFragile X Syndrome affected males demonstrate instability of DNAsequences at the site shown in FIG. 2 as FRAXA.

No variation was observed between any normal individuals, whereas everyFragile X male showed an altered mobility of this sequence. The originof this variability was localized further by using a series ofrestriction fragments from the 5 kb EcoRI fragment as probes. FragmentsA, C and D (FIG. 2G) all showed no variation between PstI digests ofnormal and affected individuals (data not shown). The 1.0 kb Pstfragment B was found to hybridize to repeat sequences in the humangenome, whereas the 520 base pair fragment E (derived from fragment B)hybridized strongly to a single PstI fragment which again demonstratedvariation in size in unrelated Fragile X Syndrome affected individuals.Some Fragile X Syndrome individuals had from one to six recognizablebands of varying size and intensity. Others had multiple bands whichmanifested as a smear. In those males with only a smear, PCRamplification of the 520 bp band from their genomic DNA confirmed thatthis sequence was present and had not been deleted from their genomes(data not shown). The number of Fragile X genotype and normal DNAsamples analyzed and the patterns of hybridization seen in them aresummarized in Table 2. Abnormal bands were seen on Southern Blots EcoRIor PstI digests) in 61 Fragile X individuals from 18 families and 48unrelated controls.

TABLE 2 Multiple 2-4 bands bands of Single band of increased ofincreased increased size size size (“smear”) Males : Affected 5 5 11 :Transmitting 3 1 1 Females : Normal 17 7 2 carriers : Affected 4 3 2Normal Males (n = 26) 0 0 0 Females (n = 22) 0 0 0

Males were classified as affected by having expression of the fragilesite and clinical features of the Fragile X Syndrome. Transmitting maleswere classified by their position in the pedigree or by having a highprobability, on the basis of flanking DNA polymorphisms, of having theFragile X genotype, and as normal by not having either fragile siteexpression or clinical features of the syndrome. Female carriers wereclassified as affected or normal on the basis of clinical features ofthe syndrome, regardless of fragile site expression.

The nature of this variable sequence was further investigated in FragileX Syndrome pedigrees, as depicted in FIG. 5. DNA from members of theillustrated Fragile X Syndrome pedigree was digested with PstI andsubjected to Southern blot analysis using fragment E as probe. Pedigreesymbols : unshaded, normal male (square) or female (circle); centraldot, normal carrier male (square) or female (circle) not expressingFragile X; half-shaded circle, normal female expressing Fragile X;shaded square, retarded fragile X syndrome male expressing Fragile X.Normal individuals in generation 3 had a less than 2% chance of carryingFragile X based upon flanking DNA polymorphisms (Sutherland, G. R., andMulley, J. C., Clinical Genet, (1990) 37:2-11).

This analysis demonstrated segregation of the variable sequence with theFragile X genotype, with altered mobilities observed in nonpenetrant“transmitting” males and carrier females as well as affected males. Thealteration in mobility varied within families where a single band wasobserved, and in the two families studied increased in size fromgeneration to generation when transmitted by females, but not whentransmitted by males, and was larger in affected individuals than innormal carriers. The lack of a single hybridizing band in some Fragile Xgenotypes may reflect somatic heterogeneity occasionally leading to asmear, since the probe sequence is known to be present. Furthermore, inall cases where a band was observed, the variation was manifest as anincrease in size, suggesting amplification or insertion. Theseproperties suggest that the sequences inserted into or amplified fromwithin the 1 kb PstI fragment are unstable in Fragile X individuals. Themolecular basis for the instability is not clear because of difficultiesin sequence analysis. However, the observation of repeat sequenceswithin the unstable region suggests that the instability might be due tovariation in the length or number of these repeats.

The restriction map of XTY26 which was derived from a Fragile Xindividual did not appear to differ from normal human DNA in the regionof instability. This may be due to an undetected small difference in thesize of the 1.0 kb PstI fragment or to deletion of the amplified regionduring cloning.

Nature of the Fragile X-Containing Fragment

The 1 kb Pst fragment is highly GC rich and in Fragile X affectedindividuals is refractory to PCR analysis. A high GC content isreflected in a CpG region which contains recognition sites for severalCpG containing restriction enzymes. Three of these sites have been foundto be subject to variations in methylation status, which segregates withFragile X Syndrome phenotype but not genotype (Vincent, A. et al.,Nature (1991) 349:624). The finding of sequences at the Fragile X locuswhich exhibit instability (presumably amplification or insertion), andwhich segregate with genotype (regardless of fragile site expression orphenotype), suggests that the degree of size increase in these sequencesmight modulate fragile X expression and the associated syndrome. Theimmediate proximity of the unstable sequences to a CpG island, denotedp(CCG)_(n), suggests interference with either the expression of a geneor the function of its product, as a molecular basis for the diseasephenotype.

The sequence of the 1 kb PstI fragment is shown in FIG. 6.

Utility of the Fragile X Probe

The previously mapped markers, Do33 and VK16, one distal and oneproximal to the Fragile X locus, frame a 150 kb fragment which containsthe fragile site as shown in FIG. 1. Excision of this 150 kb fragmentprovides a more convenient probe than either of the closely associatedmarkers. Further restriction and mapping of the 150 kb segment resultsin the preparation of a probe spanning the fragile site suitable fordiagnosis.

The isolated 520 bp segment of the 1 kb Pst from the NheI site of thePstI set fragment forms a diagnostic reagent for direct detection of theFragile X genotype. It will detect all Fragile X males by the alteredmobility of a 1 kb PstI band or its apparent absence. It will, however,only reliably detect Fragile X females where there is a band or bands ofaltered size because, for those females where the abnormal band is a“smear,” the pattern appears to be very similar to that of normalfemales. Testing Fragile X families with this probe can be used as ameans of Fragile X phenotype prediction, as well as genotypeidentification.

The fragile site-containing probe is thus used for diagnosis (e.g.,prenatal diagnosis or carrier detection) by standard technologyutilizing means to detect hybridization of the probe under appropriatestringency conditions to the abnormal sequence. Any suitable means fordetection of hybridization can be used, including radioactive orfluorescent labeling of the probe. For effective use as a probe, afragment of the 150 kb segment may be 10 to 10,000 nucleotides inlength, preferably 50 to 1000 nucleotides in length, more preferably 1001000 nucleotides in length. The probe may be prepared by enzymaticdigestion of a larger fragment of DNA or may be synthesized.

Further, by altering the stringency of the conditions of hybridizationthe sequences corresponding to the Fragile X locus can be isolated fromnormal subjects, sequenced, and corresponding sequences used in genetictherapy to correct this defect. Thus, the present invention alsoprovides a method to treat mental retardation caused by the presence ofa Fragile X locus, which method comprises replacing, repairing orcompensating for said fragile site DNA of the X chromosome of a subjectwith the corresponding fragile site DNA of a normal chromosome.

The availability of cloned sequences from the Fragile X locus also makespossible the identification of a protein product encoded by the clonedsequences. Such proteins may be identified by operably linking thecloned sequences to a promoter in an expression vector. Many appropriateexpression vectors for this purpose are widely known in the art. See,for example, Sambrook, et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,1990, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. The proteinproduct may be used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Thus, forexample, the presence, absence, or alteration of the protein product maycorrespond to the status of an affected individual. Similarly, theprotein product from a normal individual may be used to treat anaffected individual with an altered protein product.

Furthermore, monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against the proteinproduct may be raised by a wide variety of techniques widely known inthe art. These antibodies may be labeled and used in a variety ofimmunoassays, or, as described above, for therapeutic use in an affectedindividual. See, for example, Harlow, et al., Antibodies: A LaboratoryManual, 1988, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

Isolation of Polymorphic Microsatellite AC Repeats (FRAXAC1 and FRAXAC2)Linked to Fragile X

The Southern blot hybridization using probes described above, whileaccurate in determining genotype, is a relatively slow procedure,particularly for prenatal diagnosis. Genotype can be determined just asaccurately by linkage analysis where the fetus is unaffected and wheninformative markers show no recombination with the disease locus. Whensuch markers are polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based, then theaffection status for at-risk pregnancies can be determined much morerapidly than with the Southern blot-based test. Therefore,characterization of AC repeat sequences in the immediate vicinity of thefragile X site P(CCG)_(n) unstable element was undertaken as follows.

A. Identification of Microsatellite repeat sequence and design of PCRPrimers

The 108 λ subclones of the yeast artificial chromosome XTY26 werescreened in a random-primed reaction (Multiprime, Amersham) withsynthetic poly(AC.GT) (Pharmacia) radioactively labeled with α³²P-dCTP.AC repeat-containing DNA clones were identified by hybridization to thisprobe in 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 7% SDS (without carrier DNA) at65° C. for 16 hours and by washing at 65° C. for 1 hour in 2×SSC.

DNA from positive clones was digested with either HaeIII, Sau3AI, HinPI,HpaII, RsaI, HinfI or TaqI, electrophoresed on 1.4% agarose gels,blotted onto nylon membranes (GeneScreen Plus, NEN-Dupont) and probedwith ³²P-poly(AC.GT) as above. Digests which gave a hybridizing fragmentof less than 600 base pairs were chosen for subcloning into M13mp18 forsequence analysis. The derived sequences were then used to designsynthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotide primers suitable for PCR analysis oflength variation in the AC repeat sequences. These sequences for PCRprimers were chosen on the basis of their apparent uniqueness, their 50%GC composition and their lack of consecutive G residues which appear tointerfere with chemical synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides.

The markers from each microsatellite were subsequently termed FRAXAC1(from λ12), FRAXAC2 (from λ25) and FRAXAC3 (from λ26).

B. Heterozygosity of Microsatellite Regions

These primers and microsatellite regions were used to determinegenotypes as follows. PCR incubations were performed in 10 μl volumes ina Perkin Elmer-Cetus thermocycler for 10 cycles at 94° C. for 60 s, at60° C. for 909 and then 72° C. for 908, followed by 25 cycles at 94° C.for 60 s, at 55° C. for 90 s, and at 72° C. for 90 s. The volume wasadjusted to 40 μl with formamide loading buffer (95% formamide, 1 mMEDTA, 0.01% bromophenyl blue, 0.01% xylene cyanol). After denaturationat 90° C. for 3 minutes, 2.5 μl aliquots of each reaction mixture weresubjected to electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide denaturing (7 M urea)gels. Genotypes were determined after autoradiography for 18 hours.Multipoint analysis was based on genotypes of each marker in the 40large kindred pedigrees of the Centre D'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain(CEPH) and was carried out using the LINKAGE (version 4.9) package foruse with the CEPH three-generation families. The observedheterozygosities of FRAXAC3 in 18 unrelated females was only 16% and sothe characterization of this marker was not pursued further. Theobserved heterozygosities of FRAXAC1 and FRAXAC2 were found to be 45%and 80%, respectively, in 40 unrelated females. However, none of thefemales homozygous for FRAXAC2 were heterozygous for FRAXAC1 and so thecombined observed heterozygosity was also 80% (Table 3). This indicateslinkage disequilibrium between the two markers.

TABLE 3 Allele Allele % Heterozygosity Marker (AC)_(n) FrequencyObserved Expected* FRAXAC1 19 0.0625 45 43.5 18 0.0125 17 0.725 160.1875 15 0.0125 FRAXAC2 23 0.009 80 71 19 0.018 18 0.073 17 0.477 160.193 15 0.037 14 0.110 13 0.083 *Based on observed allele frequencies.

C. Genotyping of FRAXAC1 and FRAXAC2

The genotypes of both markers were determined in the 40 unrelatedfamilies from CEPH. No recombination was observed between them.

Fragile X-affected pedigrees who had previously been shown to haverecombinants in the vicinity of the fragile site were genotyped withFRAXAC2. Of those individuals who were informative, no recombination wasfound between this marker and the Fragile X genotype (as determined byhybridization with a subclone of the PstI fragment described below) orFragile X phenotype (as determined by Fragile X expression and/orintellectual handicap). Thus, these markers are considerably moreclosely linked to Xq27.3 than the previously mapped AC repeat sequencesVK23AC and VK144AC. Analysis with FRAXAC1 was not undertaken because ofthe high degree of linkage disequilibrium between the two markers. Thesubclone used as probe denoted pfxa3 is the NheI to PstI subclone of thePstI band as shown in FIG. 8.

D. Alternative Method for Fragile X Diagnosis

Thus, an alternative approach to rapid diagnostic analysis of Fragile XSyndrome would be to use these tightly linked, highly informativegenetic markers. Together with the pfxa3 hybridization probe, these newFRAXA markers provide a rational approach to prenatal diagnosis inFragile X pedigrees. This involves analysis of chorionic villi sampleDNA (CVS) with the AC repeat markers FRAXA1 or FRAXA2.3 to haplotype theFRAXA locus, followed by the Southern blots with the pfxa3 as probe todetect amplification of the P(CCG)_(n) repeat. The initialmicrosatellite results allow rapid determination of unaffected status in40% of cases whereas the prediction of phenotype for individuals withthe FRAXA genotype will be subsequently determined by the size of pfxa3hybridizing fragments.

13 1028 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA (genomic) unknown 1CTGCAGAAAT GGGCGTTCTG GCCCTCGCGA GGCAGTGCGA CCTGTCACCG CCCTTCAGCC 60TTCCCGCCCT CCACCAAGCC CGCGCACGCC CGGCCCGCGC GTCTGTCTTT CGACCCGGCA 120CCCCGGCCGG TTCCCAGCTG CGCGCATGCC GGCGCTCCCA GGCCACTTGA AGAGAGAGGG 180CGGGGCCGAG GGGCTGAGCC GCGGGGGGAG GGAACAGCGT TGATCACGTG ACGTGGTTTC 240AGTGTTTACA CCCGCAGCGG GCCCGGGGGT TCGGCCTCAG TCAGGCGCTC AGCTCCGTTT 300CGTTTCACTT CCGGTGGAGG GCCGCCTCTG AGCGGGCGGC GGGCCGACGG CGAGCGCGGG 360CGGCGGCGGC GGCGGCGGCG GCGGCGGCGG CGGCGGCGGC GGCGGCGGTG GCGGCGGCGG 420CGGCGGCGGC GGCGGCGGCG GCGGCGGCGG CGGCGGCGGC GGCGGCGGCG GCGGCCCGGA 480GCCACCTCTT CGGGGGCGGG CTCCCGGCGC TAGCAGGGCT GAAGAGAAGA TGGAGGAGCT 540GGTGGTGGAA CTGCGGGGCT CCAATGGCGC TTTCTACAAG GTACTTGGCT CTAGGGCAGG 600CCCCATCTTC GCCCTTCCTT CCCTCCCTTT TCTTCTTGGT GTCGGCGGGA GGCAGGCCCG 660GGGCCCTCTT CCCGAGCACC GCGCCTGGGT GCCAGGGCAC GCTCGGCGGG ATGTTGTTGG 720AGGGAAGGAC TGGACTTGGG GCCTGTTGGA AGCCCCTCTC CGACTCCGAG AGGCCCTAGC 780GCCTATCGAA ATGAGAGACC AGCGAGGAGA GGGTTCTCTT TCGGCGCCGA GCCCGCCGGG 840GTGAGCTGGG GATGGGCGAG GGCCGGCGGC AGGTACTAGA GCCGGGCGGG AAGGGCCGAA 900ATCGGCGCTA AGTGACGGCG ATGGCTTATT CCCCCTTTCC TAAACATCAT CTCCCAGCGG 960GATCCGGGCC TGTCGTGTGG GTAGTTGTGG AGGAGCGGGG GGCGCTTCAG CCGGGCCACC 1020TCCTGCAG 1028 28 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA (genomic)unknown 2 GATCTAATCA ACATCTATAG ACTTTATT 28 25 base pairs nucleic acidsingle linear DNA (genomic) unknown 3 AGGCTTGGAG TGCAGTGGGC AATCT 25 21base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA (genomic) unknown repeat_unit1..2 /note= “Repeat unit is (GT) which can be repeated 1-100 times.” 4GTCAGTCTCA CTCTGTCACT C 21 25 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA(genomic) unknown 5 GACTGCTCCG GAAGTTGAAT CCTCA 25 26 base pairs nucleicacid single linear DNA (genomic) unknown 6 AGACAGGATC TCACTCTGTC ACCTAG26 68 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA (genomic) unknownrepeat_unit 37..38 /note= “Repeat unit is (GT) which can be repeated1-100 times.” 7 GTATTTTTGC AAAGTTTGTC TTTCAGTATT TTATTTGTAT ATATATATATTTTTTTTTTT 60 TTTTTTAA 68 25 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA(genomic) unknown 8 GTACTGTATC AGTTATAACC CTATG 25 24 base pairs nucleicacid single linear DNA (genomic) unknown 9 CAAATTGAAG GTTTGTGGAA ACCT 2484 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA (genomic) unknownrepeat_unit 12..13 /note= “Repeat unit is (GT) which can be repeated1-100 times.” 10 TGTGTGTGTG CGTATGCATA CCCAAGACTT ATCTTATACA GGTATGCCTTGTTTTATTGC 60 ACTTTGCAAA TACTGCATTT TTTT 84 283 base pairs nucleic acidsingle linear DNA (genomic) unknown 11 GATCTAATCA ACATCTATAG ACTTTATTGTGTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTATGTGTGT 60 GTCAGTCTCA CTCTGTCACT CAGGCTTGGAGTGCAGTGGG CAATCTCTGC TCACTGCAAC 120 CTCGCCTCCC AGCTTCAAGT GACTCTCATCATGCCTCAGC CTCCTGAGTA GCTGGGATTA 180 CAGGCATGCA CCACCACACC CAGCTAATTTTTTGCATTTT TAGTAGAGTC GGCATTTCAC 240 TATGTTGGCC AGGCTGGTCT CGAACTTCTGGCCTCAAGTG ATC 283 360 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA(genomic) unknown 12 GGCCCTAATC AGATTTCCAC AAATTCTGAC TTAATATTTGCCCGCTTATA TAACAGCTCT 60 TCTTTAACAA AAACAAGTAC TTTTCTCATT AGAATTTTACTAAGAAAGCT CTTTAGTAAA 120 ACATCGACAT TATACATACA ACATATCTCA GTATCTGCTGATGAAGAACA CCAAAAAGAA 180 CCCAGATGTG ACTGCTCCGG AAGTTGAATC CTCAGTATTTTTGCAAAGTT TGTCTTTCAG 240 TATTTTATTT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTCTATATATATAT ATTTTTTTTT 300 TTTTTTTTAA AGACAGGATC TCACTCTGTC ACCTAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTG CATGATCATG 360 197 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA(genomic) unknown 13 GTACTGTATC AGTTATAACC CTATGTGTGT GTGTGCGTGTGTGTGTGTGT GTGTATGCAT 60 ACCCAAGACT TATCTTATAC AGGTATGCCT TGTTTTATTGCACTTTGCAA ATACTGCATT 120 TTTTTCAAAT TGAAGGTTTG TGGAAACCTT TTTTTTGAGCAATTCTGTAG TGCCATTTTT 180 TTCAACGGCA TGTGTAC 197

What is claimed is:
 1. A monoclonal antibody which specifically binds toa purified protein product encoded by a DNA molecule that has thesequence of SEQ ID at No:
 1. 2. The monoclonal antibody of claim 1,which has been labeled with a detectable marker.
 3. A polyclonalantibody which specifically binds to a purified protein product encodedby a DNA molecule that has the sequence of SEQ ID No:
 1. 4. Thepolyclonal antibody of claim 3, which has been labeled with a detectablemarker.